It does seem to read that way.So technically it is an advisory but not a fail?
It does seem to read that way.So technically it is an advisory but not a fail?
From the MOT Tester's Manual -
1.5 Direction Indicators
This inspection applies to: all machines except those which either have no front or rear position lamps or have such lamps permanently disconnected, painted over or masked that are:
. only used during daylight hours, and
. not used at times of seriously reduced visibility
If this situation occurs the machine presenter should be issued with a VT32 (advisory notice) recording the above.
Exemptions
If direction indicators are fitted they must meet the requirements of this inspection, but need not be fitted to a machine which:
. cannot exceed 30mph / 50kph, or
. was first used before 1 August 1986, or
. 'off road' machines which are designed to carry only the rider.
. 'off road' machines with side car designed to carry the rider and one passenger in the side car.
So technically, if a bike is registered after 1st Aug 1986 it must have indicators unless it has no lights at all.
So technically it is an advisory but not a fail?
To me, it reads that the advisory applies to the "daytime" MOT and exemption only covers the 4 criteria taken. It is probably one of these things that is open to interpretation and, unofficially, tester's discretion.It does seem to read that way.![]()
On re-reading it I think you are right. Unless the bike is pre- Aug '86 if it has lights, indicators must be fitted. That was the interpretation of a local tester when a friend put his bike in for testing without indicators last year. They got round it by masking all the lights.To me, it reads that the advisory applies to the "daytime" MOT and exemption only covers the 4 criteria taken. It is probably one of these things that is open to interpretation and, unofficially, tester's discretion.
Take the test and see what happens.
If it was me, I'd lose the belly pan and show those stunning exhaust off.
