The moon illusion

Not my attitude...it's NASA's. Oh, and India's; China's and Japan's....

Give me $65+ million a day and I'll have a go :D
You will need to raise the cash yourself.
I will reimburse you when you've succeeded.
 
You said it would prove it this time ๐Ÿ‘€

No I didn't.

But it could, if it was captured from multiple angles, from earth, flying through space and back again. And the film was proven genuine.

I can't even find any video of Soyuz or Space X from earth and docking with the ISS, and that's only about as far as I am from that there London.
 
No I didn't.

Video - technical point granted but yeh you did ๐Ÿ‘€ and you said it would prove it and shut you up ๐Ÿฅณ

"Anyway, we have the equipment to watch this all the way to the moon uninterupted right? You can buy cameras that will do it. So I expect that this time, the moon-landings-were-real folk will shut the rest of us up by videoing it. SImple."
 
Video - technical point granted but yeh you did ๐Ÿ‘€ and you said it would prove it and shut you up ๐Ÿฅณ

"Anyway, we have the equipment to watch this all the way to the moon uninterupted right? You can buy cameras that will do it. So I expect that this time, the moon-landings-were-real folk will shut the rest of us up by videoing it. SImple."


Meeting certain criteria, it could prove it.

Criteria that is not present with the examples you have given.
 
Meeting certain criteria, it could prove it.

Criteria that is not present with the examples you have given.
Nope, you didn't mention Criteria ๐Ÿ‘€
So an actual photo of the landing sight taken by the Chinese mission does not meet your criteria :unsure:
 
  • HaHaHa
Reactions: Dox
Nope, you didn't mention Criteria ๐Ÿ‘€
So an actual photo of the landing sight taken by the Chinese mission does not meet your criteria :unsure:

I didn't have to...it's wasn't a contract.

Err, no. A photo by the Tiddlys doesn't count as proof. Just as the photos from NASA doesn't.
 
If we looked hard enough surely we can refind the technology that went missing ๐Ÿ‘€

Found it!

Or this might be the Blue Peter versionโ€ฆhard to tell.

IMG_6671.webp
 
Not read the thread but I can tell you, the Moon's apparent size is due to the magnifying effect of the atmosphere.

It's nothing to do with the amount of additional mass being deposited there by human beings.
Not entirely sure what you are getting at there, but if you are suggesting depositing human beings there, then I can get on board with that and may even have some candidate suggestionsโ€ฆ
 
Back
Top Bottom