different sub frame, different seat unit, new fairings, different rear sets, cleaned up the zip ties on r/h side frame tube compared to a New Blue, thats all I can see from that photo some close ups might reveal more.
Its also the concept of what it is, Ducati could have done this oh so easily with very few new parts and it would sell albeit probably in relatively small numbers but surely thats part of what its all about??
Titanium frame.....100,000 euros though![]()
I never did work out why anyone would use Ti on a motorbike frame, ??
Stock steel frame approx 40 lbs, Ti copy frame 10 lbs ....... sounds like a good enough reason to me .... how many mag bits would it take to get the same weight saving?
I never did work out why anyone would use Ti on a motorbike frame, way too flexible, difficult to weld and can crack, on a pedal bike i know it can "damp" vibration to make the riders life easier but i wouldn't have thought this was important with an engine ??
Totally agree Nige and its one of the reasons some prefer steel to alloy but Ti is possibly too flexible, you still need stiffness at shock mounts, headstock and swingarm pivots, its difficult to control this as ti tubing is only available in certain diameters and butting is rare, with steel or alloy you have more choice and can weld in the best gauge for the job. We loked at Ti for MTB full sus but aluminium works better, Ti is ok for a hardtail but even then has limits. I'm not certain it is any advantage mounting an engine, shock or swingarmSome flex in a frame is good. One of the problems with stiff frames, from a racer's POV, is that they are bloody unstable at times...and unforgiving.