Health thread

IMG_3780.webp
 
I dont like Dr's and my experience with this shoulder replacement has maxe this worse. My Dr is telling me I can start to lift 5lbs max right now bit I have been loading 40lb bags of pellets for weeks and have been back to work for 2 weeks now where I regularly lift car batteries and other heavy stuff. They want me to wait another 8 weeks before I can start back to work at light duty limited to 15lbs max. They want us all on the exact same plan with no concession to the individual. I guess Im just a fast healer.
 
You are right but don't over do it. It's easy to get carried away and be back to square one.

I dont like Dr's and my experience with this shoulder replacement has maxe this worse. My Dr is telling me I can start to lift 5lbs max right now bit I have been loading 40lb bags of pellets for weeks and have been back to work for 2 weeks now where I regularly lift car batteries and other heavy stuff. They want me to wait another 8 weeks before I can start back to work at light duty limited to 15lbs max. They want us all on the exact same plan with no concession to the individual. I guess Im just a fast healer.
 
You are right but don't over do it. It's easy to get carried away and be back to square one.
Solid advice, I am very careful, or was when I first started to add any weight. Should there be any discomfort felt, I stop and rest immediately. I am very slow and smooth when lifting and have been working with stretchy rubber bands to add strength without the risk of tearing anything. My post was to show that individuals are all different and can feel when their body is ready to slowly increase activity, not just follow a recommended schedule.
 
When I saw this I thought surely there must be an opt out, suspecting certain faiths will object to it but the article doesn't mention one


But another article in gb news says you can ask for an opt out

"Parents will have to give consent for testing, but this means children will grow up with genetic information that some may not want to know and which could affect their future."

 
When I saw this I thought surely there must be an opt out, suspecting certain faiths will object to it but the article doesn't mention one


But another article in gb news says you can ask for an opt out

"Parents will have to give consent for testing, but this means children will grow up with genetic information that some may not want to know and which could affect their future."

How long before some government scientist identifies a "far-right" gene that can be screened for?
What follows: mandatory abortion? Forced sterilisation of the parents? Don't bet against it. Parliament has already voted to legalise the euthenasia of inconvenient babies up to the moment of birth, and of the old and sick when they become a nuisiance. It's a small step to screening for babies that might grow up to vote the "wong" way.
 
How long before some government scientist identifies a "far-right" gene that can be screened for?
What follows: mandatory abortion? Forced sterilisation of the parents? Don't bet against it. Parliament has already voted to legalise the euthenasia of inconvenient babies up to the moment of birth, and of the old and sick when they become a nuisiance. It's a small step to screening for babies that might grow up to vote the "wong" way.
*... to think the wrong way*
 
*... to think the wrong way*
We're there already. Wokery and globalist Marxism is all about thought control and the elimination of opposing views. It's just the euthanasia in the womb bit they haven't got round to yet, though our Parliament under it's WEF leadership has laid the foundations for that in the last couple of weeks.
 
We're there already. Wokery and globalist Marxism is all about thought control and the elimination of opposing views. It's just the euthanasia in the womb bit they haven't got round to yet, though our Parliament under it's WEF leadership has laid the foundations for that in the last couple of weeks.
Marxism, like almost any religion, is entirely based upon thought control.
The fundamentalist Marxist knows that in order for Communism to be truly achieved, everyone must believe the same things and work towards the same goals. Communism, in its final form, means no government is necessary as everyone "does the right thing anyway". (Ironically, this means that the statement "real Communism has never been tried" is objectively true :D) Human consciousness evolves to the point where the ultimate "man" arrives and he is of course, communist.

Euthanasia, or any mass form of murder or genocide, is acceptable to the Marxist. His view of history, both past and future, is that the end justifies the means as long as the end is Communism. Like any zealous religionist, they believe that sacrifice is acceptable in service of the Cause ... with Christians, it is self-sacrifice, with Marxists, it is the sacrifice of other lives. For the Marxist, the ending of a life, a dozen lives or a million lives, is acceptable, negligible even, as long as that serves the Marxist goals.

Anyway. The point is, when you control the decisions made by the visible portion of Government, and you control who sits "in Government", and you control "the opposition" to the Government and you control "the Protest Vote Alternative to the Mainstream" ... you don't give a shit about "votes".

The only thing you care about are squirters who are ejected by the fake "democratic" system, particularly if they have powerful voices and significant followings and are individuals who can potentially inspire resistance in others. Or did you think that the Regime hates people like Tommy Robinson (Not His Real Name) just because he is a racist thug with a history of violence? The Regime LOVES racist thugs with a history of violence (as long as they serve the current goals of the Regime).
 
Marxism, like almost any religion, is entirely based upon thought control.
The fundamentalist Marxist knows that in order for Communism to be truly achieved, everyone must believe the same things and work towards the same goals. Communism, in its final form, means no government is necessary as everyone "does the right thing anyway". (Ironically, this means that the statement "real Communism has never been tried" is objectively true :D) Human consciousness evolves to the point where the ultimate "man" arrives and he is of course, communist.

Euthanasia, or any mass form of murder or genocide, is acceptable to the Marxist. His view of history, both past and future, is that the end justifies the means as long as the end is Communism. Like any zealous religionist, they believe that sacrifice is acceptable in service of the Cause ... with Christians, it is self-sacrifice, with Marxists, it is the sacrifice of other lives. For the Marxist, the ending of a life, a dozen lives or a million lives, is acceptable, negligible even, as long as that serves the Marxist goals.

Anyway. The point is, when you control the decisions made by the visible portion of Government, and you control who sits "in Government", and you control "the opposition" to the Government and you control "the Protest Vote Alternative to the Mainstream" ... you don't give a shit about "votes".

The only thing you care about are squirters who are ejected by the fake "democratic" system, particularly if they have powerful voices and significant followings and are individuals who can potentially inspire resistance in others. Or did you think that the Regime hates people like Tommy Robinson (Not His Real Name) just because he is a racist thug with a history of violence? The Regime LOVES racist thugs with a history of violence (as long as they serve the current goals of the Regime).
You and I interpret the word squirters very differently.
 
You and I interpret the word squirters very differently.
Your obsession with sea squirts is a matter of record but is irrelevant here.

1750594583741.webp


Anyway, you regularly offer people Bourbon biscuits - why should anyone listen to you?
 
Back
Top Bottom