Desmosedici Update by Minoli

Scottch

Ninja Poopy Psycho
I thought this might be of interest to those of you who may be waiting on the V4 road bike, pinched from ducati.com.

-----SNIP-----

Today I had the chance to stop by Luciano Negroni’ s department, the part of the R&D area responsible for prototypes, to check out the progress of the new Desmosedici RR. As I promised at WDW2004, the worldwide preview of the definitive D16RR will be this year; the bike will be presented this June at the Mugello MotoGP.

It will be a beautiful bike, both esoteric and costly, with a very limited production; the D16RR is the completion of our technological challenge to put our racing motorcycles on the road.

Therefore, the article on the front page of MCN from April 5, 2006 is mistaken in saying that we will produce "an economic" version for mass production. This counts as a real “bufala" (bufala in Italian literally means buffalo but it is used colloquially to mean a mistake) and does not correspond to our actual plans for the bike. This is not the first time that the news on the cover of MCN is lacking in a factual basis. For example, just take a look at the MCN article that supposedly anticipates a new version of the 999 - this is just a cut and paste combining the 999, 916 and Desmosedici and absolutely was not designed by us. I would like to use this opportunity to set things straight giving you the real facts about the bike.

As we faced the D16RR, the discussion of 2 cylinders vs. 4 cylinders came up frequently and I think this is a very fascinating topic. Personally, I have always believed that Ducati must remain faithful to its traditions, not to renounce its character and the unique excitement that only a twin can provide. Since the discussion exists, I have decided to find out if my assumptions as a "Ducatista" can be supported on a technical basis. There is no one better than Filippo Preziosi, Ducati Corse Director, to ask the question of why motorcycles with 2 vs. 4 cylinders give riders such different sensations. Here is his answer:

“Both twin and 4 cylinders have the same amount of maximum engine torque and the torque depends mainly on engine displacement. The biggest advantage of the twin cylinder is the character of the engine torque during acceleration: two cylinders produce maximum torque at lower engine revs than 4 cylinders.

Maximum torque at lower revs represents a big advantage for a motorcycle; the engine response is more reactive. As soon as a rider opens the throttle coming out of a turn, the engine is already there, ready to push!

These characteristics of the engine also make riding on the street easier and more fun. If you accidentally approach a corner in a higher gear the engine is still reactive and the rider can still easily finish their turn.

Obviously on the track, the technical choices are driven by technical rules. For the MotoGP prototypes, the level of tuning permitted by the rules makes it impossible for a twin to be as powerful as a 4 cylinder engine.

The Superbike Championship allows for a different level of engine tuning and, as a result, it is still possible to be competitive with a twin. This gives us the advantages of the character of this type of engine.”

Our choices are clear. For our production bikes we are absolutely loyal to the “pompone” and the “Testastretta” in their different forms, varieties, possible improvements and continuous study. For the races, the most suitable choice is to make the most of the rules and to WIN. The Desmosedici replica was a challenge we took and the fulfilment of a technological dream. It will be produced in very limited numbers so as too keep our focus and concentration on our motorcycle family par excellence: the Superbike.

Till next time.

-----SNIP-----

Sounds like they're a bit @@@@ed off with the MCN at least!
 
When the 851 came out I lusted after one but coudnae afford it and the same with the 916 so in about 10 years after they have first appeared I might be able to afford one! The More Crap News is no different from the Sun, in that if theres no news they create a story to sell papers and hope we've forgotton about it by the time it is proved untrue:crazy: :liar:
 
Scottch said:
Remember to give him plenty time to reply - this rubber ring might be nipping a bit :whistle: ;)

That's nasty... :D I did speak to him yesterday he was telling me about his incidents but was in good spirits which is the main thing :D and he seems to think it'll be no problem sorting something out for me..... :whistle:
 
steve748 said:
When the 851 came out I lusted after one but coudnae afford it and the same with the 916 so in about 10 years after they have first appeared I might be able to afford one! The More Crap News is no different from the Sun, in that if theres no news they create a story to sell papers and hope we've forgotton about it by the time it is proved untrue:crazy: :liar:
i think likening the sun to the mcn was a bit harsh on the sun.at least the sun admits to having tits employed at the paper;)
 
Back
Top Bottom