Arena bomb survivors win conspiracy harassment case Manchester Arena bomb survivors win conspiracy harassment case
Conspiracy theories, who starts them and why?
- Thread starter West Cork Paul
- Start date
it is a sham trial. It should never have been brought, and was only ever going ti have one outcome.
The reason for it is to stop anyone questioning such events.
Take the time to read up on the trial and you will see just what a sham it was. The defending lawyer was excellent and tied the prosecution up in their own bullshit.
The case was heard months ago but the verdict (by one judge) was delayed until today. The verdict sent by email FFS.
The judge is obviously under instructions ti give this result.
iaindavis.substack.com
The reason for it is to stop anyone questioning such events.
Take the time to read up on the trial and you will see just what a sham it was. The defending lawyer was excellent and tied the prosecution up in their own bullshit.
The case was heard months ago but the verdict (by one judge) was delayed until today. The verdict sent by email FFS.
The judge is obviously under instructions ti give this result.
The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall - Part 1
*******************************************
iaindavis.substack.com
Thanks Rich,it is a sham trial. It should never have been brought, and was only ever going ti have one outcome.
The reason for it is to stop anyone questioning such events.
Take the time to read up on the trial and you will see just what a sham it was. The defending lawyer was excellent and tied the prosecution up in their own bullshit.
The case was heard months ago but the verdict (by one judge) was delayed until today. The verdict sent by email FFS.
The judge is obviously under instructions ti give this result.
The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall - Part 1
*******************************************
I've just read Parts 12&3 and eagerly await the next instalment.
Here's 4: The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall - Part 4
And 5: The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall - Part 5
This is proof if any were needed, that cases can be brought by the PTB with the sole purpose of achieving a predetermined result - no matter the evidence presented or how lacking a case / prosecution is.
JJL (aka Everclear)
New member
it is a sham trial. It should never have been brought, and was only ever going ti have one outcome.
The reason for it is to stop anyone questioning such events.
Take the time to read up on the trial and you will see just what a sham it was. The defending lawyer was excellent and tied the prosecution up in their own bullshit.
The case was heard months ago but the verdict (by one judge) was delayed until today. The verdict sent by email FFS.
The judge is obviously under instructions ti give this result.
The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall - Part 1
*******************************************
I usually just read not post but sounds like you've swallowed the Alex Jones/Sandy Hook pill
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hibbert-v-Hall-Judgment.pdf
I guess you can't get your head around it. When you see the evidence, it is impossible that a bomb went off there. The only evidence for the official story, is witness testimony - no hard physical evidence. People do conspire and lie. A lot of Hibbert's lies were brought up in the case.
This trial was a done deal before it started - just like the Jones / Sandy Hook trial. They have a system which they employ.
First, there is a pre-trial trial during which a Judge decides what evidence will be allowed at the main trial. In both these cases, the defendent is not allowed to show their evidence that the event was a false flag. So the actual trial is based on the premise that the event actually happened as the official story says.
These trials were not about whether the event happened or not. The Judge decides it did, regardless of the evidence; that's their part in the conspiracy. Another judge takes up the actual trial.
Both these trials were about 'harm' caused to witnesses by calling them liars.
The fact the Hibberts were responsible for more upset to their daughter that Hall ever was, was ignored by the trial Judge.
Get a copy of this - you can download it for free, but probably not for long as no doubt the court will order its removal
I'd lend you mine but you might burn it
Last edited:
JJL (aka Everclear)
New member
I don't understand spreading this. There are published autopsies in coroners reports containing in graphic detail the extensive injuries sustained by those who died in the bombing (in many cases of mutilated burnt and dismembered corpses).
Hall has harassed survivors including the Hibberts, the father paralysed and the daughter severely brain damaged by a bolt from the bomber's backpack passing through her skull.
This is not entertainment.
Some paragraphs from the 262 paragraph judgment I linked above.
Paragraph 188
Mr Hall’s approach was to treat the statements of numerous professionals, including Mr Hibbert’s surgeon, as well as of an independent panel, and figures in authority, as of no value. By the time he published the Film, the Book and the 2020 Video, Hashem Abedi had been convicted, yet Mr Hall paid no heed to the facts that demonstrated the jury found proved to the criminal standard. He had no positive evidence that Mr Hibbert had lied about what happened to him and his daughter, and no sensible basis for believing he had done so. In my judgment, tracking down such a private and vulnerable young person as Eve and her mother, going to her home, speaking to her neighbours and surreptitiously taking video footage of her, on her own doorstep, where she had reason to feel safe, was a wholly unwarranted interference with the family’s right to privacy, which is properly characterised as oppressive and unacceptable.
Paragraph 189
Mr Hall has abused media freedom. Over a period of years, he has repeatedly published false allegations, based on the flimsiest of analytical techniques, and dismissing the obvious, tragic reality to which so many ordinary people have attested. He has published his allegations widely over a period of years. He has done so for commercial gain. All of this conduct has a natural tendency to cause serious distress, especially when those targeted are vulnerable.
Paragraph 211
The false allegations that Mr Hall made were grave, with the consequence that a very large number of people have been misinformed, and led to believe that the Attack was a hoax, that the claimants were not injured in the Attack, and that Mr Hibbert has (along with many others) repeatedly and publicly lied to the public for monetary gain. Mr Hall has published and continues to publish his false allegations despite the Attack having been the subject of thorough investigations, a criminal trial, and authoritative reports which any reasonable person would recognise command respect. Mr Hall’s publications are not only false, but they also lack any semblance of balance.
Paragraph 213
Despite his industriousness, Mr Hall brought no sensible critical analysis to bear in producing his publications. Even in cross-examination, having heard Mr Hibbert give sworn evidence as to what happened to him and to Eve, and having heard Ms Gillbard confirm the nature and timing of their injuries, Mr Hall said that “there is no evidence” to show that what they say actually happened. His approach is blinkered and irrational, and I have no hesitation in concluding that the course of conduct as a whole was unreasonable.
Hall should be behind bars.
"Mr Hall’s approach was to treat the statements of numerous professionals, including Mr Hibbert’s surgeon, as well as of an independent panel, and figures in authority, as of no value."
Is this not exactly what has been done with the defendants evidence?
Is this not exactly what has been done with the defendants evidence?
Thanks Everclear…
You can write reports that say anything - that doesn’t mean any of it happened. If you bother to read Iain Davis’s report, and watch the video within it…then come back and show evidence (evidence mind, not ‘someone wrote…’) that he says has never been shown, then I’ll take you seriously.
The fact that the prosecution were allowed to say that they had seen video that backs up their case - but the court specifically denied that ‘evidence’ could be shown in court…it’s laughable if it wasn’t so serious.
A lot of people should be in prison but Hall isn’t one of them.
If you’re genuine in your belief, how do you see the evidence presented that proves the official story is a lie, but accept the words of people you don’t know over your own eyes and mind?
And here's the reason the case was brought...
He looks like ETwww.facebook.com
Sounds like him tooHe looks like ET
I thought that was just an infantilised fuckwit. Child-like simpletons or "progressives" as they now call themselves. Functionally and intellectually retarded, angry, frustrated, uncomprehending, hate-filled and inadequate in every conceivable sense.
If God in his wisdom had created a caricature of the infantilised fuckwit as a warning to mankind, and a reminder that some life forms are better drowned in a bucket at birth for the good of the gene pool, this is what such a creature would look like:
I thought that was just an infantilised fuckwit. Child-like simpletons or "progressives" as they now call themselves. Functionally and intellectually retarded, angry, frustrated, uncomprehending, hate-filled and inadequate in every conceivable sense.
If God in his wisdom had created a caricature of the infantilised fuckwit as a warning to mankind, and a reminder that some life forms are better drowned in a bucket at birth for the good of the gene pool, this is what such a creature would look like:
that’s not really a conspiracy theory, it’s a fact
It's hate speech! you should be receiving a visit from the constabulary shortly
It is. But the point is that we are governed by conspiracy theorists who are incapable of seeing the world as it really is. And they are governing, passing laws and now even putting people in jail, based on ideas that are fantasies.
Good idea. I would have thought yeah definately republican voters(not all, just small groups) but after seeing the liberal tears of democrats, fek me they have come out with some blinders on how Trump won.
www.wired.com
Election Denial Conspiracy Theories Are Exploding on X. This Time They’re Coming From the Left
Conspiracy theories about missing votes—which are not, in fact, missing—and something being “not right” are being spread widely on X in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory.
And all on 'X'Good idea. I would have thought yeah definately republican voters(not all, just small groups) but after seeing the liberal tears of democrats, fek me they have come out with some blinders on how Trump won.
Election Denial Conspiracy Theories Are Exploding on X. This Time They’re Coming From the Left
Conspiracy theories about missing votes—which are not, in fact, missing—and something being “not right” are being spread widely on X in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory.
True or theory?
A farmer spots " how @Keir_Starmer 's new best buddies at BlackRock are going to screw you over in 7 steps.
"1. They will start buying up small plots of agricultural land at double the normal price. They will issue a directive to all of their energy companies simultaneously to aggressively acquire plots for carbon capture. These third parties will start bidding against each other and force the value of agricultural land up.
"2. Initially farmers won't believe their luck - "these city folks are mad! if they want to buy an acre for £50K, who am I to say no to these fools" is what you'll hear down the pub.
"3. These crazy prices will set record high comparisons for agricultural land. When a farmer dies, their farm will be valued using these new metrics and the next generation will discover the farm they thought was worth £3M is worth £9M and they don't have anything close to the money needed to cover the tax.
"4. In swoops a BlackRock subsidiary with a "Agri Debt Finance Tax Relief" product to lend them 20% the "value" of their farm so they can pay the taxes.
"5. The debt will come with conditions (a covenant) that the farm has to adopt and maintain certain practices. It has to use certain BlackRock owned fertilisers, software, machinery and labour solutions that get the farm ready to interface with a larger conglomerate.
"6. When a farm cannot make its debt payments, it is sold at auction. BlackRock subsidiaries are instructed NOT to buy these farms at auction. They have a special arrangement to buy the unsold farms at a rate that covers the unpaid debt plus outstanding fees and taxes to government... basically what the farm was originally worth.
"7. A BlackRock subsidiary then takes over the farm, consolidates it with a massive group of farms and uses illegal immigrant labour to staff the farm (which will be another government program they institute to deal with the immigration crisis). The government will literally pay for the labour costs as part of this plan making the farms wildly profitable and making small family farms unable to compete."
A farmer spots " how @Keir_Starmer 's new best buddies at BlackRock are going to screw you over in 7 steps.
"1. They will start buying up small plots of agricultural land at double the normal price. They will issue a directive to all of their energy companies simultaneously to aggressively acquire plots for carbon capture. These third parties will start bidding against each other and force the value of agricultural land up.
"2. Initially farmers won't believe their luck - "these city folks are mad! if they want to buy an acre for £50K, who am I to say no to these fools" is what you'll hear down the pub.
"3. These crazy prices will set record high comparisons for agricultural land. When a farmer dies, their farm will be valued using these new metrics and the next generation will discover the farm they thought was worth £3M is worth £9M and they don't have anything close to the money needed to cover the tax.
"4. In swoops a BlackRock subsidiary with a "Agri Debt Finance Tax Relief" product to lend them 20% the "value" of their farm so they can pay the taxes.
"5. The debt will come with conditions (a covenant) that the farm has to adopt and maintain certain practices. It has to use certain BlackRock owned fertilisers, software, machinery and labour solutions that get the farm ready to interface with a larger conglomerate.
"6. When a farm cannot make its debt payments, it is sold at auction. BlackRock subsidiaries are instructed NOT to buy these farms at auction. They have a special arrangement to buy the unsold farms at a rate that covers the unpaid debt plus outstanding fees and taxes to government... basically what the farm was originally worth.
"7. A BlackRock subsidiary then takes over the farm, consolidates it with a massive group of farms and uses illegal immigrant labour to staff the farm (which will be another government program they institute to deal with the immigration crisis). The government will literally pay for the labour costs as part of this plan making the farms wildly profitable and making small family farms unable to compete."
It has to be something like that. Nothing else makes any sense.
BlackRock and Vanguard, if your government, has any dealings with these corporate giants, they are corrupt, as these companies deal with leverage.
If they're doing business with governments or political entities they have leverage.
Ipso facto they have leverage on Queer Starmer and his chums?
Just saying like!
If they're doing business with governments or political entities they have leverage.
Ipso facto they have leverage on Queer Starmer and his chums?
Just saying like!
JJL (aka Everclear)
New member
