Ireland to co-host next fossil fuel phase-out conference in South Pacific island Tuvalu
Announcement comes as 60 countries agree landmark move to phase out oil, gas and coal
Climate Change (Global Warming) ๐ฅถ๐๐
- Thread starter Exige
- Start date
46 IPCC scientists have resigned.
The reason?
Because they are not being listened to, because their opinions differ from the prevailing narrative!
But don't just take my word for it, here are their statements:
Dr. Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that "no significant acceleration in sea level rise was observed in the 20th century." This was not included in the IPCC's summary for policymakers.
Dr. Lucka Bogataj: "Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere do not cause global temperature increases... the temperature changed first, and about 700 years later, a change in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere followed."
Dr. John Christy: "What few people know is that most scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that there is such a thing as climate change. The IPCC's findings are consistently misrepresented and/or politicized in every successive report."
Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: "Humans have contributed only a few tenths of a degree to global warming. Solar activity is a key driving force behind the climate."
Dr. Richard Courtney: "The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the hypothesis of human-caused global warming is incorrect."
Dr. Judith Curry: "I'm not just going to give my opinion and support the IPCC, because I have no confidence in the process."
Dr. Robert Davis: "Global temperatures are not changing as predicted by the most advanced climate models. The IPCC summary for policymakers never once mentions temperature measurements via satellites."
Dr. Willem de Lange: "In 1996, the IPCC named me as one of about 3,000 'scientists' who agreed that there is a demonstrable human influence on the climate. I did not. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that uncontrolled, catastrophic climate change is the result of human activities."
Dr. Chris de Freitas: "Government decision-makers should by now know that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driving force behind global climate is in dispute; and with it, the assumed need for costly measures to limit carbon dioxide emissions. If they don't know it, it's because of the noise from climate hysteria, which is based on the fallacy of 'arguments from ignorance' and predictions from computer models."
Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: "Much more progress is still needed with regard to our current understanding of the climate and our ability to model it."
Dr. Peter Dietze: "By using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has seriously underestimated the future uptake of carbon dioxide by the oceans."
Dr. John Everett: "It's time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal areas have been much warmer and colder than predicted in current climate change scenarios. I have studied the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and am of the opinion that there is no problem with increasing acidification, even at the unlikely levels in the most commonly used IPCC scenarios."
The reason?
Because they are not being listened to, because their opinions differ from the prevailing narrative!
But don't just take my word for it, here are their statements:
Dr. Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that "no significant acceleration in sea level rise was observed in the 20th century." This was not included in the IPCC's summary for policymakers.
Dr. Lucka Bogataj: "Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere do not cause global temperature increases... the temperature changed first, and about 700 years later, a change in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere followed."
Dr. John Christy: "What few people know is that most scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that there is such a thing as climate change. The IPCC's findings are consistently misrepresented and/or politicized in every successive report."
Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: "Humans have contributed only a few tenths of a degree to global warming. Solar activity is a key driving force behind the climate."
Dr. Richard Courtney: "The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the hypothesis of human-caused global warming is incorrect."
Dr. Judith Curry: "I'm not just going to give my opinion and support the IPCC, because I have no confidence in the process."
Dr. Robert Davis: "Global temperatures are not changing as predicted by the most advanced climate models. The IPCC summary for policymakers never once mentions temperature measurements via satellites."
Dr. Willem de Lange: "In 1996, the IPCC named me as one of about 3,000 'scientists' who agreed that there is a demonstrable human influence on the climate. I did not. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that uncontrolled, catastrophic climate change is the result of human activities."
Dr. Chris de Freitas: "Government decision-makers should by now know that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driving force behind global climate is in dispute; and with it, the assumed need for costly measures to limit carbon dioxide emissions. If they don't know it, it's because of the noise from climate hysteria, which is based on the fallacy of 'arguments from ignorance' and predictions from computer models."
Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: "Much more progress is still needed with regard to our current understanding of the climate and our ability to model it."
Dr. Peter Dietze: "By using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has seriously underestimated the future uptake of carbon dioxide by the oceans."
Dr. John Everett: "It's time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal areas have been much warmer and colder than predicted in current climate change scenarios. I have studied the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and am of the opinion that there is no problem with increasing acidification, even at the unlikely levels in the most commonly used IPCC scenarios."
I once heard an American scientist interviewed on the radio saying that studying cyclical climate fluctuations without investigating sun spots and insisting it must be all man-made was like trying to diagnose engine failure in your car by checking the tyre pressures.
43K views ยท 1.8K reactions | ๐๐ฑ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐? ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ โ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ โ. Prof. Richard Lindzen argues that after repeated reports found no strong statistical link between climate change and extreme weather, dramatic storms and
๐๐ฑ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐? ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ โ๐
๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ โ. Prof. Richard Lindzen argues that after repeated reports found no strong statistical link between climate change and extreme...
www.facebook.com
Brilliant - show this to anyone arguing for renewables
www.facebook.com
92K views ยท 4.4K reactions | ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ง ๐๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฑ๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ฅ. Watch the full exclusive interview: https://www.freedom-research.org/p/freedom-research-podcast-9-professor Prof Ian Plimer says the only truly โrenewableโ thing about
๐๐๐ง๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ง ๐๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฑ๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ฅ. Watch the full exclusive interview: https://www.freedom-research.org/p/freedom-research-podcast-9-professor Prof Ian Plimer says the only truly...
www.facebook.com
6.4K views ยท 477 reactions | Temperature Delusion | Electroverse
Temperature Delusion
www.facebook.com
Regulators allowed Obama-backed solar power plant 'to kill birds'
The Ivanpah Solar Power Plant, which was approved to be built when Obama was in office, reflects concentrated sunbeams off its shiny surface, killing birds constantly.