9/11 Twin towers
- Thread starter Barry Hell
- Start date
So you admit you were sick. I rest my case!Tried it once........caught a dose. Some things are hard to forgive.
Listen from 32.50 (I skipped most of it but stumbled on this gem)she’s crackers
So basically all 4 flights were remotely taken over and flown to a secret location where all the people on board we later killed in a hanger
Soon we will get to the bit where the hot steaming engine was trucked in and deposited on the street - ffs
Yeah, I have doubts over some of the detail including that bit. But her knowledge of how airplanes and their staff run under emergencies is very informative. And that the 'phone calls' (which were technically impossible at the time) were scripted and used terminology that would not be used by airline staff.
That engine - is that the engine part found under some scaffolding, that was found to be from a model of engine that was never fitted to the planes involved? And what happened to the other three?
She's a crank - the engine story is stoopid - and no matter how much will be proven wrong, you just make more shit up. Soooo, lets destroy our own towers - pretend planes flew into the towers when they really didn't and let's plant an engine (we can drive it in pre heated and steaming under the smoke screen
) but let's make sure it's an engine not used on the aircraft that we pretended flew into the towers - come on ffs, you're not that gullible 
Have you got a video showing an engine 'hot and steaming'? Or did you embelish it with that?
And where are the other 3 engines?
Gullible? You're the MSM parrot, not me. (Except on the climate, and convid jabs...you know they lie about those don't you. But they're as honest as they come on this eh? LOL).
And where are the other 3 engines?
Gullible? You're the MSM parrot, not me. (Except on the climate, and convid jabs...you know they lie about those don't you. But they're as honest as they come on this eh? LOL).
The engine story came from one of yours silly.
OK, so lets drive in a hot steamy engine that isn't used on the planes that we never flew into the towers, but one will do as only Dox will notice in over 20 years time from now.
You are transfixed with this MSM term of yours, try 'reality' as that's where I am: you crazy
.
Really, is that all you have got now after I ridiculed the loony woman you supported to the point where you decided to disown her theory
you seem to always side for loons 
it wasn't my made up story silly as mentioned earlier - it was one of your comrades' stories he told to a mate of mine remember
Doesn't look hot...no steam. You must've made that up right?
Look how it's posed, with a street sign. Within the scaffolding. With police tape around it, even before the towers came down. Could've been planted there the day before couldn't it with plastic around the scaffolding so no one could see it. You know, like a prop.
And on top of that, it had elements that were never fitted to one of the planes. Pretty much proves the MSM tale is just that.
Look how it's posed, with a street sign. Within the scaffolding. With police tape around it, even before the towers came down. Could've been planted there the day before couldn't it with plastic around the scaffolding so no one could see it. You know, like a prop.
And on top of that, it had elements that were never fitted to one of the planes. Pretty much proves the MSM tale is just that.
Really, is that all you have got now after I ridiculed the loony woman you supported to the point where you decided to disown her theory
Ahh, so you're distancing yourself from it...a mate of a mate. Very wise. Probably best not to pretend you know all about it under those circumstances.
Nutter - you had the story yesterday
I knew about the engine 20 years ago sunshine.
Is that 1/8th scale
Either you believe it's from one of the 9/11 planes, or you don't - make your little mind up.
Yes
No
Which is it?
Or is there another engine that you were talking about (hint; no there fucking isn't).
So either agree with me that that is not from a 9/11 plane. Or show us this other engine that a mate of a mate saw hot and steamy
It’s MSM and you believe it?Either you believe it's from one of the 9/11 planes, or you don't - make your little mind up.
Yes
No
Which is it?
Or is there another engine that you were talking about (hint; no there fucking isn't).
So either agree with me that that is not from a 9/11 plane. Or show us this other engine that a mate of a mate saw hot and steamy
How big is a real one, ask yourself
Could be a part of an AirCon system
- you know the guy my mate was talking to was a nutter, I told you the story as well you know, he said there were no planes (just like you think) and they drove the engine in on a truck after the explosions: he’s clearly one of your lot, not a mate of a mate 
You seem to ignore what’s gone before and try and twist it
Are you pissed?
Do I believe it was from a plane on 9/11? Obviously not, stupid.
You've been talking (in another thread too) about an engine that was found on 9/11. As if that was proof of the official story . You say it was hot and steamy.
There's only one 'engine' found that day - put forward by MSM as proof (just like you).
It didn't belong to any planes that crashed into the towers.
This is common knowledge from back in the day.
Do you have any more brilliant third party insights into what happened that day, or is that it?
Do I believe it was from a plane on 9/11? Obviously not, stupid.
You've been talking (in another thread too) about an engine that was found on 9/11. As if that was proof of the official story . You say it was hot and steamy.
There's only one 'engine' found that day - put forward by MSM as proof (just like you).
It didn't belong to any planes that crashed into the towers.
This is common knowledge from back in the day.
Do you have any more brilliant third party insights into what happened that day, or is that it?
You always get angry when you lose
You wouldn’t know.
The whole engine thing is the same scenario as the damage at the pentagon. In one of the photos, an engine part was quite clearly identifiable as belonging to the plane. Only the naysayers said, 'hold on' the engines on that plane are so big you can stand up in the intake and the fan showing was only around a metre or so. 'Conspiracy!"
Another clearly identifiable engine section was clearly ruled out of being any part of the engines propulsion system. The wording is important here. Not part of the engines propulsion system, confirmed by the planes manufacturer. But was part of the APU. Too late! They already heard "not part of the propulsion system" so now someone is trying to change our minds! WTF! Conspiracy seed, right there!
So from then on no explanation was going to be listened to, no amount of engine cutaway diagrams was going to be taken any notice of and the sad truth is that if you even try and debunk a conspiracy theory, the holder of that theory just has it reinforced in their own mind as, well, why else would someone try to change my mind about something if I wasn't so dangerously close to the truth?
So the most obvious and rational explanation will now have to be a coverup. With no exceptions. I guess this must be why some people believe in a flat earth? Even tho, surely, it makes sense that the edges must be drooping? Even just a little?
Another clearly identifiable engine section was clearly ruled out of being any part of the engines propulsion system. The wording is important here. Not part of the engines propulsion system, confirmed by the planes manufacturer. But was part of the APU. Too late! They already heard "not part of the propulsion system" so now someone is trying to change our minds! WTF! Conspiracy seed, right there!
So from then on no explanation was going to be listened to, no amount of engine cutaway diagrams was going to be taken any notice of and the sad truth is that if you even try and debunk a conspiracy theory, the holder of that theory just has it reinforced in their own mind as, well, why else would someone try to change my mind about something if I wasn't so dangerously close to the truth?
So the most obvious and rational explanation will now have to be a coverup. With no exceptions. I guess this must be why some people believe in a flat earth? Even tho, surely, it makes sense that the edges must be drooping? Even just a little?
Duke of Prunes
Well-known member
I wouldn't personally put much faith in the CAA being reliable and unbiased .
In the aftermath of the 747 MAX disasters , big chunks of CAA inspection and safety procedures
were found to have been written by an outside party ....
......Boeing !
So were they wrong in this instance of the engine belonging to the plane?
Also, how did Boeing having input into the inspection and safety procedures benefit them re the 747max? They got grounded right?
Who do you think should write the inspection procedures re Boeing aircraft? QAnon?
Last edited:
Exactly that!!! They squirm and squirm, then get so silly no one will argue with them so they are under the illusion others must be agreeing, so then they say 'look how silly everyone thinks you are' when someone points out the blatant truth that they will never ever see again themselves - amazing really
Your afro is on upside-down, you nutter.Exactly that!!! They squirm and squirm, then get so silly no one will argue with them so they are under the illusion others must be agreeing, so then they say 'look how silly everyone thinks you are' when someone points out the blatant truth that they will never ever see again themselves - amazing really
View attachment 63087