Conspiracy theories, who starts them and why?

Loz said:
Is there any chance of Mr Grumpy (Exige) taking a chill-pill.?

Stu - will you calm down?
Click to expand...

giphy (2).gif
 
West Cork Paul said:
View attachment 68634
View attachment 68635
View attachment 68636
View attachment 68637
View attachment 68638
Click to expand...

So, the whole article is telling us what the author personally believes. It shows us the limit of his comprehension.

When he talks about the likes of Sunak becoming PM can't be the product of careful grooming and placement of a 'shadowy' group...he doesn't tell us that Sunak, along with the likes of Trudeau, Ardern, Macron etc are all the product of the WEF (is that not a group that remained in the shadows until the last 3 years or so? And openly brag that they have people in governments of dozens of countries?).

Instead, his opinion is that all the bad decisions and mistakes are the result of bad management, or bad luck. If that were the case, what are the odds that these bad decisions and mistakes always end up favouring the same groups, and always further the goals and aims of the shadowy WEF; the Club of Rome, and their ilk?

Everything we're seeing today has been long in the planning. How many times will people accept so called mistakes or bad management? What we're seeing is that after a certain number of such things, they move on the leader and bring in the next one to carry on business.

As for the Mone scam - it isn't a theory that the group she is connected to took full payment for out of spec goods. Conspiracy yes, theory no.

However, he states his belief that not one British MP will be shown to have profited from the convid scam. Is he so naive / ignorant to think that benefits will only be as direct payments?

How many of us agree with him on that?
 
Dox said:
So, the whole article is telling us what the author personally believes. It shows us the limit of his comprehension.

When he talks about the likes of Sunak becoming PM can't be the product of careful grooming and placement of a 'shadowy' group...he doesn't tell us that Sunak, along with the likes of Trudeau, Ardern, Macron etc are all the product of the WEF (is that not a group that remained in the shadows until the last 3 years or so? And openly brag that they have people in governments of dozens of countries?).

Instead, his opinion is that all the bad decisions and mistakes are the result of bad management, or bad luck. If that were the case, what are the odds that these bad decisions and mistakes always end up favouring the same groups, and always further the goals and aims of the shadowy WEF; the Club of Rome, and their ilk?

Everything we're seeing today has been long in the planning. How many times will people accept so called mistakes or bad management? What we're seeing is that after a certain number of such things, they move on the leader and bring in the next one to carry on business.

As for the Mone scam - it isn't a theory that the group she is connected to took full payment for out of spec goods. Conspiracy yes, theory no.

However, he states his belief that not one British MP will be shown to have profited from the convid scam. Is he so naive / ignorant to think that benefits will only be as direct payments?

How many of us agree with him on that?
Click to expand...
Excellent article. Very illustrative.

Off-the-scale gaslighting. As usual.

We're gonna need a new scale.
 
Here’s a pic that some idiotic moron has posted on fb to pretend the recent space mission wasn’t real and was a hoax 🤪

83BA1516-6140-4A3A-B792-78696B2AB05C.jpeg



And here’s an actual pic from the mission but only at a web site resolution taken during the mission…


DCC8B37B-A7E7-443B-A1D4-09D2BD54C438.jpeg



Why do these idiots bother 🤣🤣🤣
 
Last edited:
Dox said:
"Which do you bother"? 🤣
Click to expand...
Oh, look, a typo and he thinks he's won the internet, just because all his arguments about silly shit are ridiculous - very well done indeed 🤪

Go on, defend the picture - did you post it by the way or were you the loon that replied saying that proves you can't believe anything you see on the news - omg tell me that wasn't you 👀
 
Exige said:
Oh, look, a typo and he thinks he's won the internet, just because all his arguments about silly shit are ridiculous - very well done indeed 🤪

Go on, defend the picture - did you post it by the way or were you the loon that replied saying that proves you can't believe anything you see on the news - omg tell me that wasn't you 👀
Click to expand...

It's not so much the typo, as the sentence it was in (that you've amended since): "Which do these idiots bother?"

You're asking me to defend a meme that you posted? Then you call me a loon? You're losing it.
 
Dox said:
It's not so much the typo, as the sentence it was in (that you've amended since): "Which do these idiots bother?"

You're asking me to defend a meme that you posted? Then you call me a loon? You're losing it.
Click to expand...
Why get so upset about me highlighting a conspiracy theorists idiotic post on FB? You have lost it years ago :)
 
RA5 said:
I am surprised no one has posted on this outrageous conspiracy theory:
View attachment 70066
Yet, not so outrageous nowadays given the current climate if true.
Click to expand...

Obama is on video at least twice during speeches, referring to his wife as Michael.

My ex wife was called Lisa…I never once called her Liam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loz
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom